The interface had drifted into two languages — the frame in English, everything
added later in German — which is worse than either, since the same idea appeared
under two names depending on when that part was written. Sorting by title still
uses the German collation, so Übung 2 comes before Übung 10: that is about the
notes, not the chrome.
Two archive folders were renamed with it (bilder/ → images/, zeichnungen/ →
drawings/). The importer reads both spellings, and both the old and new marker
line for a drawing — archives exported before this are on disk, and an import
that quietly dropped their drawings would be the worst kind of tidy-up.
Making a note, uploading a PDF and importing Markdown were three buttons side by
side, two of them icons you had to hover to identify. They are the same act —
putting something new in this notebook — so they are now one + menu.
The search box moves out of the sidebar and into the note list, labelled with the
notebook it narrows. Nothing changed about what it does: it has always searched
only the notebook you are in, but from the sidebar it read as searching
everything.
A separator no longer carries a sentence explaining the order the sort menu
already names. Renaming joins removing on the right-click menu — a left-click on
the label started an edit, so the row could not be touched without falling into
one.
218 unit tests, 238 browser checks across eleven suites. Two of those caught real
breakage from this change rather than needing a translation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two rules governed version retention: the newest 50 per note, and a sweep
of anything past 90 days. The second was wrong. The count already bounds
what a note can accumulate, so age only ever deleted history nothing had
replaced — and it bit hardest exactly where history is most wanted, a
note left alone for a quarter of a year losing its whole past for having
done nothing. It is off unless VERSION_RETENTION_DAYS is set.
How many versions to keep is now a notebook's own setting, falling back
to the server default when left empty. A reference notebook can keep
fifty of everything while a scratch one keeps three.
That makes freeing attachments answerable. A picture taken out of a note
cannot be deleted straight away: the versions from before still show it,
and restoring one would find a hole. It is released once no current note
and no kept version refers to it — which, with retention by count, is
when the last version holding it is pushed out.
The server cannot look for itself, bodies being encrypted, so the client
reports a note's attachments on every save as it already does for links,
and a version inherits what the note held when it was snapshotted — by
definition what that version contains.
Two things make it safe rather than merely plausible. Silence is not
"uses nothing": a note written before this existed has no rows, which
looks identical to one with no pictures, so nothing is released for a
user while any of their notes has yet to report — the prefetch that fills
the search index reports for them on its first pass. And an upload has a
row before the note using it does, so recent attachments are left alone.
POST /api/admin/housekeeping runs the sweep on demand.
Caught while testing: the same block of markup had been pasted into the
create-notebook dialog as well, where the state it referenced did not
exist — the dialog crashed on open.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Stage seven, and the last of the PDF work. A PDF note now offers the
document with your marks stamped in, the untouched original, or just the
notes written beside it.
pdf.js only reads, so writing needs pdf-lib — behind a dynamic import
like pdf.js, so the bundle everyone downloads carries no PDF writer for
the sake of people who never export one. Main bundle grew 6 kB; the
180 kB writer arrives only when used.
The coordinate decision from stage four is what makes this a translation
rather than a reconstruction: strokes were stored in page points from the
start, the only space a PDF understands, so nothing has to be guessed
back from screen pixels. Only the origin moves, PDF putting it at the
bottom-left.
The stored file is never modified — pdf-lib builds a new document — so a
clean copy stays available however often it has been drawn on. The suite
re-fetches the stored bytes after exporting and compares them, and checks
the plain export is byte-identical to what was imported.
Eraser strokes are dropped. On screen they remove ink by drawing in
destination-out; a PDF content stream has no equivalent, and stamping
them would put grey scribbles exactly where something had been rubbed
out.
The suite renders both files with pdf.js and counts dark pixels, 1633
against 2557. A larger file only proves bytes were added; this proves ink
can be seen.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
They lived in a scratch directory under /tmp, which was cleared overnight;
four of the five were simply gone. Whatever they were worth, they were
worth nothing kept there.
Rewritten against a shared lib.mjs. The old ones registered their users
through the sign-up form, which no longer exists — each suite now creates
a throwaway account through the admin API and deletes it afterwards, so a
run leaves the database as it found it. The previous generation left nine
accounts behind; those are gone too.
Three test hooks went into the app, each of which earns its place beyond
testing: aria-label on the note title (the sidebar search box is also a
text input, and a screen reader could not tell them apart either),
data-note-row on list rows, data-user on admin rows.
Two suites were flaky in ways worth naming, because both were the test
misreading the app rather than the app misbehaving:
- ticking a task then inserting a note link put the link inside the task
list, since Control+End lands there. Verified against the server that
the tick itself persists correctly; the suite now leaves the list first
and asserts where the link ended up.
- the note-title lookup matched the sidebar's Trash entry, which wears the
same emoji as a note row.
56 checks across five suites, all passing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
