A long table lay straight across the gap between two sheets with a row
cut in half, and a shorter one jumped to the next sheet whole leaving
the rest of the first blank. Tables are broken between their rows now,
which is where a table breaks on paper. The spacer there is a tr with
one borderless cell: a div inside a tbody is not something the browser
keeps. Its own spacer rows are subtracted again on the next measurement
and counted into the shift every block below inherits — miss that and
everything under a broken table is measured a page too high.
A dialog closed in the middle of an edit if a selection was dragged past
its edge: the click lands on the nearest common ancestor of press and
release, which is the backdrop, and every dialog read that as "clicked
beside me". They remember where the press began now. All ten.
A note and a chapter can wear a mark of their own beside the name,
chosen from a short list searched by what a thing is for rather than
from the system emoji keyboard — a different thing on every machine, and
three thousand pictures for a decision that is "which of these is the
invoice notebook". A separator takes its own colour and one of five
shapes, and a chapter can be divided like the notebook it sits in: both
places a chapter is shown draw it with one component now, so it cannot
be divisible in the column and not in the unfolded block.
Also: a chapter's colour could not be cleared, because the update rode
on COALESCE and null there means "leave it alone". A table's header row
is legible on the dark theme. Three entries in the table's own menu were
still German. Opening a notebook opens its first note, on a wide screen
only — on a phone the list is the screen.
Fourteen suites green: 364 browser checks, 241 unit tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The hand-made order is where a notebook's own arrangement lives:
separators show, rows can be put where they belong, nothing slides about
by itself. Starting in "last changed" made both of those look broken
until the sort menu was found — pressing "+ Separator" there drew a line
the order cannot display, so the button appeared dead. A notebook nobody
has arranged still reads newest-first, because untouched rows all carry
position 0, so nothing is lost by starting there. The views keep "last
changed": they are questions asked of every notebook at once and have
nowhere to keep an arrangement. The button that draws a line is now only
offered in the order that can show one.
Removing a chapter left you stuck in the confirmation. Every destructive
action goes through one helper that takes the question down again; this
one set the dialog directly and bypassed it, so the chapter was removed
and the prompt stayed over the app. Closing now happens where the dialog
is rendered, so it happens whoever asked and however they asked.
The suites did not catch that, and the reason is worth keeping: they
read the list straight through the overlay, which is in the DOM the
whole time, and passed while the screen was in fact stuck. Both now
assert the question is gone afterwards.
The separator is no wider than its name. It sat in a fixed 132px slot —
chosen so the row would not jump when renaming began — with a short name
floating in a gap it did not fill.
Thirteen suites green: 345 browser checks, 241 unit tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A chapter did not show until the notebook had a note in it. "Nothing
here" was asked of the notes alone, so a notebook whose only contents
were chapters showed the empty-list panel with the chapters hidden
behind it — making a chapter in a fresh notebook appeared to do nothing
at all. It is asked of every row now, and a notebook with chapters but
no loose notes says so in one line rather than looking like a list that
failed to load.
The colour is chosen while the chapter is being made, in the dialog that
asks for its name. It is what tells one chapter from the next, and
having to right-click a fresh one to say which it is meant two visits
for one decision. Renaming and recolouring afterwards are one entry in
its menu and one write; the server already took the colour on create,
the client simply never sent it.
The word "here" is gone. The line along the top of the pane says which
of the two places you are in, and saying it twice was noise.
Thirteen suites green: 338 browser checks, 241 unit tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A note is in exactly one chapter, or in none — which means the notebook
itself. Chapters sit above the loose notes; tapping one opens its own
list and the menu button becomes the way back out, which on a phone is
the only way, since the list fills the screen.
A chapter is not a wastebasket. Removing one never removes what it held:
the notes come back to the notebook, where they can be seen and filed
again. That is ON DELETE SET NULL, and it is also written out in the
delete route, because it is the promise the whole thing rests on and
should be visible where it happens rather than inferred from a schema.
The dialog says so too, with the number of notes affected, and the suite
removes a chapter holding three notes and asks the server for all three.
Three rules keep the two levels honest. A note filed into a chapter
leaves the notebook's own list, or filing it would appear to do nothing.
A chapter belongs to its notebook, so the server refuses to file a note
into a chapter of a book it is not in, and moving a note to another
notebook clears its chapter. And separators belong to the list they were
drawn in: a separator's order counts the notes before it, which means
nothing across lists.
Two bugs found while building it, both a day old and both affecting the
desktop rather than the phone they were written for:
- A submenu was clipped away. The context menu had been given
`overflow-y: auto`, which cuts off anything flying out sideways — so
the notebooks under "Move to..." were invisible and every click on them
landed on the note list behind. The side was inverted too:
`right: 100%` places a panel on the left.
- A separator was a one-pixel hairline in the border colour with faint
grey text on near-black. Present, and on a phone effectively invisible.
And one test that never measured what it claimed. It asked whether a
dragged note had become "the most recently changed" by reading the order
on screen — but three notes made seconds apart share an `updated_at`
second, so that order is a tie broken arbitrarily. It passed on luck for
weeks and fell over on a run a fraction faster. It now compares the
timestamps themselves, before and after the drag.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
