The ink was stuck on page one while the writing carried on without it,
which stopped making sense the moment a note could run to four pages.
Every page is exported anyway, so every page can be drawn on.
Pages are numbered the way the PDF reader numbers them, and only pages
that carry ink are stored, so the keys are the drawn pages. While drawing
there is always one blank page past the end: pages otherwise come from
how far the writing runs, and to draw on page three you would first have
had to write three pages.
A drawing that lives entirely on page one is still written in the old
single-page shape. Nothing requires that — it means an ordinary note is
stored exactly as it always was, and a device running an older build
still shows it.
The bin clears the page being looked at. Undo and redo work on the
drawing as a whole, because one Undo button that means four different
things depending on where you scrolled is not a button anyone can use.
And a real bug found on the way out: the exporter has written
drawings/<note>.png since the interface was put into English, while the
importer was still looking for zeichnungen/<note>.png. A drawing exported
by this very app came back from its own archive as nothing at all. Both
names are read now, and so are the further pages.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
They lived in a scratch directory under /tmp, which was cleared overnight;
four of the five were simply gone. Whatever they were worth, they were
worth nothing kept there.
Rewritten against a shared lib.mjs. The old ones registered their users
through the sign-up form, which no longer exists — each suite now creates
a throwaway account through the admin API and deletes it afterwards, so a
run leaves the database as it found it. The previous generation left nine
accounts behind; those are gone too.
Three test hooks went into the app, each of which earns its place beyond
testing: aria-label on the note title (the sidebar search box is also a
text input, and a screen reader could not tell them apart either),
data-note-row on list rows, data-user on admin rows.
Two suites were flaky in ways worth naming, because both were the test
misreading the app rather than the app misbehaving:
- ticking a task then inserting a note link put the link inside the task
list, since Control+End lands there. Verified against the server that
the tick itself persists correctly; the suite now leaves the list first
and asserts where the link ended up.
- the note-title lookup matched the sidebar's Trash entry, which wears the
same emoji as a note row.
56 checks across five suites, all passing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
